MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments Thursday over whether a Republican-controlled legislative committee’s rejection of a state agency rule that would ban the practice of “conversion therapy” for LGBTQ+ people was unconstitutional.
The challenge comes amid the national battle over LGBTQ+ rights. It is also part of a broader effort by the Democratic governor, who has vetoed Republican bills targeting transgender high school athletes, to rein in the power of the GOP-controlled Legislature.
Here are things to know about the case:
So-called conversion therapy is the scientifically discredited practice of using therapy to “convert” LGBTQ people to heterosexuality or traditional gender expectations.
The practice has been banned in 20 states and in more than a dozen communities across Wisconsin. Since April 2024, the Wisconsin professional licensing board for therapists, counselors and social workers has labeled “conversion therapy” as unprofessional conduct.
Advocates seeking to ban the practice want to forbid mental health professionals in the state from counseling clients with the goal of changing their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Fair Wisconsin, the only statewide LGBTQ+ civil rights and political advocacy organization, has heard about “conversion therapy” happening across the state, said the group’s executive director Abigail Swetz.
However, accurate data about how often it is happening is hard to come by, she said. There would be some data if the ban is enacted and the state is able to take action against licensed practitioners, but that wouldn’t include attempts at “conversion therapy” made by religious institutions, Swetz said.
The provision barring “conversion therapy” in Wisconsin has been blocked twice by the Legislature’s powerful Joint Committee for the Review of Administrative Rules — a Republican-controlled panel in charge of approving state agency regulations.
The case before the liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court will determine whether the ban survives. The court will also determine if that legislative committee has been overreaching its authority in blocking a variety of other state regulations during Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ administration.
The lawsuit brought by Evers targets two votes by the joint committee. One deals with the Department of Safety and Professional Services’ “conversion therapy” ban. The other vote blocked an update to the state’s commercial building standards.
Republicans who supported suspending the “conversion therapy” ban have insisted the issue isn’t the policy itself, but whether the licensing board had the authority to take the action it did.
Evers has been trying since 2020 to get the ban enacted, but the Legislature has stopped it from going into effect.
“The stakes are very high here,” said Swetz, the leader of Fair Wisconsin.
There should be a ban so young people are not “subjected to very, very damaging practices,” Swetz said.
The “conversion therapy” ban is one of several rules that have been blocked by the legislative committee. Others pertain to environmental regulations, vaccine requirements and public health protections.
Evers argues in the lawsuit that the panel has effectively been exercising an unconstitutional “legislative veto.”
The court sided with Evers in one issue brought in the lawsuit, ruling 6-1 in July that another legislative committee was illegally preventing the state Department of Natural Resources from spending money on a land stewardship program.
The issue related to state regulations was broken out and will be heard Thursday.
The Legislature, in arguments filed with the court, cites a 1992 Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling upholding the Legislature’s right to suspend state agency rules. Overturning that ruling, the Legislature contends, would be “deeply disruptive.”
Evers, in arguing that ruling should be overturned, says that by blocking the rule, the legislative committee is taking over powers that the state constitution gives to the governor to carry out laws. The 1992 ruling conflicts with the constitution and has “proved unworkable,” Evers argued in court filings.
The state’s rulemaking process, which takes a long time and is complicated, has been a contentious one subject to numerous lawsuits for decades.
“It is time to end this failed constitutional experiment, criticized since its conception, and return Wisconsin to the constitutional mainstream,” Evers argued in filings.
The court, controlled 4-3 by liberal justices, hears arguments from both sides on Thursday and will issue a written ruling in the coming months.
Brought to you by www.srnnews.com
